（新春走基层）“田园侠女”台胞陈竹音眼中的大陆乡村幸福年******
中新网山东费县2月1日电 题：“田园侠女”台胞陈竹音眼中的大陆乡村幸福年
作者 吕妍
“我是一位地地道道的山东费县媳妇，能回到山东过新年真的非常开心，沂蒙山就是我的家。”兔年春节刚过，台胞陈竹音回忆在山东乡村过年的心情时，仍难掩兴奋。
图为台胞陈竹音撰写“两岸一家亲”春联。 受访者供图陈竹音是土生土长的台湾女孩，大学毕业后成为了一名武术特技演员，参演了30多部影视作品。2020年，她与山东青年张希龙因戏结缘，2022年二人走进婚姻殿堂，陈竹音成为了“山东媳妇”。2023年也是这位台湾姑娘第二次来到山东省临沂市费县胡阳镇玉米庄村过年。
“山东对于台湾人来说特别亲近，台北到处都有山东大饼、山东饺子，山东还是孔子的故乡。所以就很想和老公回山东看看、走走。”刚刚过去的兔年春节假期，陈竹音跟着婆婆一起摊煎饼、去磨坊磨面、采摘西红柿，体验道地的农村春节。同时从事自媒体行业的她，也将这些山东农村的日常生活记录在了视频里，分享给全国各地的网友们。
“现在乡村振兴取得了很多成就，费县就是美丽乡村的缩影，我想把实实在在的山东农村生活展现给我的亲朋好友，还有关注我的媒体跟网友们。”武打演员出身的陈竹音一直有个田园武侠梦，她将武侠元素融入到乡村田园生活中，并用短视频的形式呈现出来。
图为陈竹音和老公正在拍摄“田园武侠梦”系列视频。 受访者供图陈竹音表示，因为职业原因，她和丈夫都很喜欢武侠风格，就想到将自己擅长的动作戏与大陆乡村田园的美好风景联系起来，并推出了“田园武侠梦”系列短视频，记录下理想中的乡村“桃花源”。“我很喜欢用沂蒙山小调当背景音乐，那宛转悠扬的曲调和我的视频氛围很搭，常常能带来意想不到的效果。”
“我想成为一名导演，用视频记录下在大陆真实的生活。”陈竹音说，不论是以乡村一望无际的麦田为背景拍摄武侠风格的短视频，还是记录拔萝卜、摊煎饼等乡村生活，她都会将短视频同步到台湾的相关视频平台上。“现在大陆乡村建设正飞速发展，平整的道路、明亮的路灯、井然有序的大棚，包括农村的卫生间都打理得非常好，每家每户都有WiFi。未来，希望通过我的视频让更多台湾民众了解真实的大陆乡村生活。”
陈竹音的丈夫张希龙告诉记者，起初，他还很担心陈竹音不适应乡村生活，“但看她穿红棉袄和妈妈一起干农活、包水饺、赶年集，能融入朴实而又精彩的乡村生活，我由衷的开心。”
春节期间，陈竹音帮着张罗年夜饭，听着门外的鞭炮，看着满桌的饭菜，一家人享受着团圆带来的欣喜、安宁。新的一年，陈竹音许下心愿说，“第一个愿望是希望可以带妈妈来祖国大陆走走看看。第二个愿望是希望两岸关系像除夕夜的团圆饭一样团团圆圆，两岸一家亲。”(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
